Saw 3 interest?
Moderator: drizzle
-
- 6th Man HOF
- Posts: 7269
- Joined: Thu Jan 29, 2004 12:48 pm
- Location: Beast Coast
Saw 3 interest?
Halloween.
Anyone anticipating this? thoughts on 1 and 2? Did you like 1 more than 2 or 2 more than 1?
Will 3 be the best? Or is this whole franchise complete garbage?
I happen to enjoy these movies ('cept for Carey Elwes acting in pt 1)
Anyone anticipating this? thoughts on 1 and 2? Did you like 1 more than 2 or 2 more than 1?
Will 3 be the best? Or is this whole franchise complete garbage?
I happen to enjoy these movies ('cept for Carey Elwes acting in pt 1)
-
- Posts: 9469
- Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2004 10:53 pm
- Philaflava
- King of The DPB'rs
- Posts: 81382
- Joined: Fri Jan 31, 2003 12:37 am
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 1044
- Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2004 10:26 pm
- Location: Springfield Massachusetts USA
- Contact:
'Saw I' and 'Saw II' are two of the worst movies I've ever seen in my entire life.
I could at least see how they could have made a good movie out of 'Saw I' if they had tried. The elements were there and there were things I enjoyed about it despite it's horridness. But 'Saw II' was just egregiously bad. The story, the actors, the acting, the sets, the effects, the lighting, the way it was shot, the "twists," were all utterly terrible.
I'm sure I'll see 'Saw III' at some point and hate it as well.
I could at least see how they could have made a good movie out of 'Saw I' if they had tried. The elements were there and there were things I enjoyed about it despite it's horridness. But 'Saw II' was just egregiously bad. The story, the actors, the acting, the sets, the effects, the lighting, the way it was shot, the "twists," were all utterly terrible.
I'm sure I'll see 'Saw III' at some point and hate it as well.
-
- King Duggan
- Posts: 29461
- Joined: Wed Feb 11, 2004 2:51 pm
- Location: Hang Gliding Off Motherfuckin Versace Sky Scrapers
-
- 6th Man HOF
- Posts: 7269
- Joined: Thu Jan 29, 2004 12:48 pm
- Location: Beast Coast
I'll address you, and that, later, once I've fully calmed down. But if you really thought we got our asses handed to us, you're criminally insane. Going to overtime had Drew not hand delivered the ball to Lito. Keep that in mind. After all the mistakes we made, and 7 sacks, we were 6 yards away from bringing that game to OT. So don't give me that asses handed to us claim. It's a shame your team really couldn't blow us out having dished out 7 sacks and 3 INT's. So spare me Gloss. Round 1 goes to you and your worthless, lucky Eagles. Long season,Philaflava wrote:Speaking of Saw. Whoelse "Saw" the Eagles hand the Cowboys their ass yesterday?
and we're 2-2, not 0-4. See you soon.
- Random Sample
- Posts: 13973
- Joined: Thu Oct 16, 2003 3:55 pm
- Location: Pittsburgh PA
- Contact:
yeah they are doing a pretty terrible job promoting this movie i guess. i just found out about this movie on friday because i walked by a bus stop poster. you would figure if it's coming out this month they would already have tv trailers and whatnot.blastmaster wrote:Until this thread I had no idea that a third one was coming out.
i agree with what most have said about this franchise, both movies have sucked, yet i will still probably end up renting this one as well.
-
- Posts: 5543
- Joined: Thu Apr 22, 2004 12:53 am
- Location: Roa, Va
- Contact:
-
- 6th Man HOF
- Posts: 7269
- Joined: Thu Jan 29, 2004 12:48 pm
- Location: Beast Coast
One can look at it that way, but the Eagles as a whole did not dominate Dallas. If Philly caused 4 turnovers, and 7 sacks, how could we possibly still be in the game with :32 seconds left on the 6 yard line. Drew makes that pass, game is tied and going to overtime. The score did not reflect domination.the Wiper wrote:pendy, from an uninvolved viewpoint, donovan owned your soul yesterday, and exposed your defense.
coming from a browns fan, so take that with a smidge of salt, but i watched the whole game, and i don't know how much different the game in dallas will be...
yeah, they got close at the end there...
however, and again from a detached viewpoint, that game has a much better chance being a blowout for the eagles than coming down to a last-second interception...
depending on the next couple weeks, dallas will still probably be a small favorite at home, but that depends on the next couple weeks..
however, and again from a detached viewpoint, that game has a much better chance being a blowout for the eagles than coming down to a last-second interception...
depending on the next couple weeks, dallas will still probably be a small favorite at home, but that depends on the next couple weeks..
-
- Habitual Line-stepper
- Posts: 10084
- Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2004 4:19 am
- Location: Miami, Florida
- Contact:
Of course! I knew coming in they would try to top the first with crazier death contraptions and a ludicrous conclusion.shopvack wrote:first one had some realparts, but i never bothered with the second.
is the second even more ridiculous?
Cash Rulz ponders the subjectivity of art:
Cash Rulz wrote:Taste are funny.
-
- Career Leader in LOL's
- Posts: 29936
- Joined: Thu Jan 29, 2004 10:36 pm
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 8819
- Joined: Tue Mar 16, 2004 2:50 pm
- Location: Humboldt
This is news to me, hopeless! I absolutely hated part 1, and avoided part 2. But uh yeah, Hills Have Eyes is a contender for top ten of the year right now. That shit was on point like a motherfucker. Still surprised it didn't get more love around here. No idea how it fared on horror centric boards.HopeLess wrote:Like Stormy, I like them for what they are...But I'd rather watch Wolf Creek, The Hills Have Eyes or Hostel.
Thanks for starting the horror thread though my man, Hope is a top poster with no doubt.
-
- Habitual Line-stepper
- Posts: 10084
- Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2004 4:19 am
- Location: Miami, Florida
- Contact:
I'm moving up Hills Have Eyes on my Netflix queue based on this. Don't let me down.StormShadow wrote:This is news to me, hopeless! I absolutely hated part 1, and avoided part 2. But uh yeah, Hills Have Eyes is a contender for top ten of the year right now. That shit was on point like a motherfucker. Still surprised it didn't get more love around here. No idea how it fared on horror centric boards.HopeLess wrote:Like Stormy, I like them for what they are...But I'd rather watch Wolf Creek, The Hills Have Eyes or Hostel.
Cash Rulz ponders the subjectivity of art:
Cash Rulz wrote:Taste are funny.
-
- Posts: 8819
- Joined: Tue Mar 16, 2004 2:50 pm
- Location: Humboldt
-
- Posts: 8819
- Joined: Tue Mar 16, 2004 2:50 pm
- Location: Humboldt
-
- King Duggan
- Posts: 29461
- Joined: Wed Feb 11, 2004 2:51 pm
- Location: Hang Gliding Off Motherfuckin Versace Sky Scrapers
Wow. I have absolutely NO idea why I thought you said anything about saw at all. You must have just been on my mind...StormShadow wrote:This is news to me, hopeless! I absolutely hated part 1, and avoided part 2. But uh yeah, Hills Have Eyes is a contender for top ten of the year right now. That shit was on point like a motherfucker. Still surprised it didn't get more love around here. No idea how it fared on horror centric boards.HopeLess wrote:Like Stormy, I like them for what they are...But I'd rather watch Wolf Creek, The Hills Have Eyes or Hostel.
Thanks for starting the horror thread though my man, Hope is a top poster with no doubt.



But yeah, the "Saws" are strictly "aight".
THHE is awesome though. To me, that's the way a remake should be done, if it has to be done.