Nintendo sons Sony

↑↑↓↓← → ← → B A Start

Moderator: Sigma

Post Reply
User avatar
Comedy Quaddafi
Posts: 13515
Joined: Mon May 14, 2007 12:15 pm
Location: Southsea, UK

Nintendo sons Sony

Post by Comedy Quaddafi »

:copy:

Sony May Post Biggest Loss in 4 Years on PlayStation 3 Consoles

By Hiroshi Suzuki

May 15 (Bloomberg) -- Sony Corp., the world's second-largest consumer electronics maker, may report its biggest quarterly loss in four years after the PlayStation 3 game console failed to spur as much demand as Nintendo Co.'s Wii player.

The net loss at Tokyo-based Sony may have widened to 75.8 billion yen ($630 million) in the fiscal fourth quarter ended March 31, from 66.5 billion yen a year earlier, according to the median estimate of 11 analysts surveyed by Bloomberg. Sales probably rose 9.5 percent to 2.02 trillion yen, the survey showed.

PlayStation 3 is being outsold by Wii by about two to one, causing Sony's game division, its second-largest by revenue, to post a fourth-quarter loss of 121 billion yen and a record 245 billion yen deficit for the fiscal year, according to five of the 11 analysts. The loss may exceed profits from electronics such as Bravia televisions, and the movie unit, whose ``Spider-Man 3'' generated record box-office sales when it opened this month.

``The extent of the recovery in the game business will be the main theme this fiscal year,'' said Naoki Fujiwara, who oversees $720 million at Shinkin Asset Management Co. in Tokyo.

Chief Executive Officer Howard Stringer, 65, who took over in 2005, promised to raise the company's percentage of annual operating profit, or sales minus the cost of goods sold and administrative expenses, to 5 percent of revenue by the end of March 2008. That would be the highest annual operating margin since the year ended 1999.

``This year will be the first time Stringer's management really comes under scrutiny,'' said Fujiwara.

Sony spokesman Shigenori Yoshida declined to comment for this article because the company reports earnings tomorrow.

Record Games Loss

Sony will probably fall short and generate an operating margin of 4.1 percent, according to the survey. Last fiscal year, Sony had an operating profit of 80 billion yen, or 1 percent of sales, the survey showed.

For the full article, check the source.
Source: http://www.vgchartz.com/forum/thread
Whether to Jason of Philaflava or John Podesta, I will speak my fucking perspective openly
- MB

Seiko Flossberg
Posts: 9486
Joined: Thu Dec 07, 2006 7:03 pm
Location: Where one of the greatest MC's was a local cat

Post by Seiko Flossberg »

Both consoles suck, the 360 is the troof.

User avatar
Sigma
Posts: 3503
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 12:13 am
Location: UK
Contact:

Post by Sigma »

Seiko Flossberg wrote:Both consoles suck, the 360 is the troof.
It's hardly making a profit for MS though.

Image

The Microsoft figures are for the Home Entertainment Division which also includes things like the Zune, but I would say that the Xbox and Xbox 360 consoles account for the majority of their losses in that area.

User avatar
The Red Scare
Posts: 6453
Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2004 10:38 am
Location: Boston, MA
Contact:

Post by The Red Scare »

this is a more appropriate Electric Relaxation thread

User avatar
Myjah
Posts: 9469
Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2004 1:30 am
Location: minneapolis, mn

Post by Myjah »

My family (me, sister, mom, that is) have a Wii and a 360, but no PS3. Those things were too hard to get back when we actually might have cared about it.
I <3 Employee.

Galvatron78
Splack Morris
Posts: 9024
Joined: Thu Mar 04, 2004 2:54 pm
Location: In Red Lobster with my shirt off eatin' on shrimp

Post by Galvatron78 »

they need to just gon' make it $350 and call it a mufuckin' night.

User avatar
EMCEE DARTH MALEK
Posts: 9714
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 12:51 am

Post by EMCEE DARTH MALEK »

Galvatron78 wrote:they need to just gon' make it $350 and call it a mufuckin' night.
yeah i would get one then. Some of the games comin out look real dope. btw stupid question but does it play ps2 games? im sure it does. i missed out on metal gear 3.
1. Nas
2. Drake

that's pretty much it fam.

User avatar
Reason
Kim Jong iLL
Posts: 26846
Joined: Mon May 24, 2004 4:07 pm
Location: Gangnam Style Death

Post by Reason »

Galvatron78 wrote:they need to just gon' make it $350 and call it a mufuckin' night.
word up last night we saw the ps3 at 599.99 meanwhile the wii was 249.99. now guess which muthafucka i'm typing this shit on
Nets 2022

Kalel
Internet Celebrity
Posts: 8943
Joined: Fri Jul 30, 2004 2:30 pm
Location: Metropolis
Contact:

Post by Kalel »

Hey Sony,

Image

You're fired!

User avatar
Sigma
Posts: 3503
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 12:13 am
Location: UK
Contact:

Post by Sigma »

EMCEE DARTH MALEK wrote:
Galvatron78 wrote:they need to just gon' make it $350 and call it a mufuckin' night.
yeah i would get one then. Some of the games comin out look real dope. btw stupid question but does it play ps2 games? im sure it does. i missed out on metal gear 3.
The first batch of PS3s had the Emotion Engine chip in them - the chip from the PS2. The later batch didn't (including all of the ones sold in Europe). That functionality has been replaced by software. You can check game compatibility here: -

http://www.us.playstation.com/Support/CompatibleStatus

As for the price, knocking $250 off a console that's already a loss leader at $600 leaves a massive gap to make up with sales of games and accessories.

User avatar
EMCEE DARTH MALEK
Posts: 9714
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 12:51 am

Post by EMCEE DARTH MALEK »

uh oh looks like metal gear solid has some problems.

yeah about the price, I didn't mean it would be a wise business decision to cut the price to 350, i just meant i wish they would so i could buy it.
1. Nas
2. Drake

that's pretty much it fam.

User avatar
Sigma
Posts: 3503
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 12:13 am
Location: UK
Contact:

Post by Sigma »

EMCEE DARTH MALEK wrote:yeah about the price, I didn't mean it would be a wise business decision to cut the price to 350, i just meant i wish they would so i could buy it.
Fair play. Me too. I just get the feeling though, that some people are waiting cos they're expecting a large price cut in the near future. In the UK, the price has already been cut a little, but only to

De Seven Free
Posts: 1789
Joined: Sun Feb 01, 2004 3:10 pm
Location: Manchester UK
Contact:

Post by De Seven Free »

Sigma wrote:As for the price, knocking $250 off a console that's already a loss leader at $600 leaves a massive gap to make up with sales of games and accessories.
Exactly, it's simply not a $350 console, and that mistake can't be rectified until the cost of the components needed to produce a trojan horse for Blu Ray drops significantly. But I think success in the HD-DVD vs Blu-Ray war would be a more significant reason to drop the price and increase the user base than increased sales of games and accessories.

Post Reply