- Ubisoft fucking up bad with AC: Unity
- GamerGate

- M$ dropping the price rapidly on the Xbone and changing their whole steez by selling kineticless units
- Rock$tar still not releasing the fucking Heists

feel free to add on dudebros....
Moderator: Sigma
thekeentwo wrote:hustler we can totally have sex
thekeentwo wrote:hustler we can totally have sex
This. I have read at least a dozen articles on gamergate and I still have no fucking idea what it is except I hate every one involved. I hate "gamers" because well they are horrible people. Yet the Capt Save a Hos have been as bad.None wrote:
But for real, GamerGate is the worst shit ever.
It really does suck. As someone who's been in a situation where I had to produce a product before a deadline, it sucks that the big suits have no appreciation for or sensitivity to the actual work that the programmers / artists do. It's usually a matter of get it by the deadline, when the focus should be on producing a quality product.Combo7 wrote:It's impossible that all these launch bugs for all these games weren't found by QA. Publishers don't give a fuck anymore. "Just get it on the shelves as soon as possible and patch it later" is a strategy that'll probably come back to bite them once people realize how pointless preordering has become.
I will do my best. Most of the online game sites at least the big ones are pay for play in that they take bribes (ad dollars) to give good reviews. On top of that many of the top ones (Polygon and Kotaku comes to mind) might as well be a Womans and Genders Study department. These sites love to talk about how awful and sexist gamers are and the industry is and give reach around for "games" that have the "correct" message even though they are fucking awful games.ric wrote:in said thread please explain what happened in all these instances
the fuck is gamer gate?
While I disagree with the tone, that is a fairly decent summation of the issue. Mainly it is a bunch of whiny, entitled pissbabies masquerading their cause under the need for journalistic ethics in video game journalism. In reality, it is a way to be a shitty human being, justify the shitty behaviors the video game industry perpetuates in video games (and behaviors that are core to them indicative of death and rape threats) and act like any call for change in those behaviors is social activism and has no place in video games.ThaJim2 wrote:I will do my best. Most of the online game sites at least the big ones are pay for play in that they take bribes (ad dollars) to give good reviews. On top of that many of the top ones (Polygon and Kotaku comes to mind) might as well be a Womans and Genders Study department. These sites love to talk about how awful and sexist gamers are and the industry is and give reach around for "games" that have the "correct" message even though they are fucking awful games.ric wrote:in said thread please explain what happened in all these instances
the fuck is gamer gate?
That is the back ground I think. Probably a lot more to it.
Ok fast forward the maker of one of these awful fucking "games"* fucks apparently half the indy game industry and her boyfriend tweets about it. So gamer starts to think he is detective. Well the game press pretends nothing is wrong. And of course Gamer being Gamer goes Gamer and starts dropping rape and death threats. Basically everyone involved in this story is a horrible human being and deserve each other.
I am probably way to nice to gamer in this mostly because fuck anyone that wants to take away me shooting people for a few hours a week with friends. Games rarely transcend the medium and for good reason Valiant Hearts kind of blows as an actual form of interaction. If I want a indepth story I read a book or watch a movie.
*If these games did not have the "correct" message these same reviewers would be blasting this for the bullshit it is.
None wrote:While I disagree with the tone, that is a fairly decent summation of the issue. Mainly it is a bunch of whiny, entitled pissbabies masquerading their cause under the need for journalistic ethics in video game journalism. In reality, it is a way to be a shitty human being, justify the shitty behaviors the video game industry perpetuates in video games (and behaviors that are core to them indicative of death and rape threats) and act like any call for change in those behaviors is social activism and has no place in video games.ThaJim2 wrote:I will do my best. Most of the online game sites at least the big ones are pay for play in that they take bribes (ad dollars) to give good reviews. On top of that many of the top ones (Polygon and Kotaku comes to mind) might as well be a Womans and Genders Study department. These sites love to talk about how awful and sexist gamers are and the industry is and give reach around for "games" that have the "correct" message even though they are fucking awful games.ric wrote:in said thread please explain what happened in all these instances
the fuck is gamer gate?
That is the back ground I think. Probably a lot more to it.
Ok fast forward the maker of one of these awful fucking "games"* fucks apparently half the indy game industry and her boyfriend tweets about it. So gamer starts to think he is detective. Well the game press pretends nothing is wrong. And of course Gamer being Gamer goes Gamer and starts dropping rape and death threats. Basically everyone involved in this story is a horrible human being and deserve each other.
I am probably way to nice to gamer in this mostly because fuck anyone that wants to take away me shooting people for a few hours a week with friends. Games rarely transcend the medium and for good reason Valiant Hearts kind of blows as an actual form of interaction. If I want a indepth story I read a book or watch a movie.
*If these games did not have the "correct" message these same reviewers would be blasting this for the bullshit it is.
"They thought our journalistic integrity was compromised by free Xboxes, they have not seen how that theater would erupt to free pizza". - The late, great Ryan Davis.
I'm pretty sure it's been established that the journalist she slept with never even reviewed her game(s), hence from the Forbes article, "While the initial concerns were quickly proven to be all smoke and no fire..."Tired & Broke wrote:personally the most egregious thing to me about the whole thing was that whore Zoe fucking for reviews...